Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home/jnade/1.jnade.z8.ru/docs/b1567d8eb25c5d5771d7f57f1cb149bd0a0bd643/linkfeed.php on line 277

Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home/jnade/1.jnade.z8.ru/docs/b1567d8eb25c5d5771d7f57f1cb149bd0a0bd643/linkfeed.php on line 283

One of the most commonly abused rules in the English language relates to the proper use of “who” and “that.” You will frequently find these words improperly interchanged in the written word and in speech.

Quiz time. Which of the following sentences use the words “who” and “that” correctly?

  1. She was the type of woman who collected men’s hearts like trophies.
  2. Bob and Ted were the only members of the council that ever resisted her.
  3. They were people that grew up in difficult times and learned to survive.
  4. The boys were of the caste who were looked down upon by “cultured” folk.

Your answer?

All four of the sentences were wrong. Here’s how they should have been written:

  1. She was the type of woman that collected men’s hearts like trophies.
  2. Bob and Ted were the only members of the council who ever resisted her.
  3. They were people who grew up in difficult times and learned to survive.
  4. The boys were of the caste that was looked down upon by “cultured” folk.

Here’s the rule:

Use “who” when referring to one or more individuals. Use “that” when referring to a type, class or species.

The way I remember this rule is to always use “who” when referring to an individual or group of individuals, and use “that” when referring to the group itself.

So in the first sentence, “that” is correct because the phrase “that collected men’s hearts like trophies” directly describes the group (the type of woman) itself. “She” is merely a representative of that type

The last phrase in the second sentence (“who ever resisted her”), refers to two individuals who belong to a council – not to the council itself.

The third sentence talks about individual people, so “who” is used. True, you could argue that those people form a type, class or species, but we didn’t mention a type, class or species – just people.

In the fourth sentence, the phrase “that was looked down upon by ‘cultured’ folk” refers directly to the caste and not to the boys. The boys were members of that caste. So “that” is right.

It can be a fine line. But that’s English. And that’s why people who write get paid the big bucks.